<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- Comment at the start -->
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
     <title>Philip Dorrell's blog</title>
     <link>http://www.1729.com/blog</link>
     <description>Writings about science, mathematics, computers and philosophy.</description>
     <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +1200</lastBuildDate>
     <generator>InplaceCMS</generator>
     <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
     <ttl>1440</ttl>
     
<item>
  <title>The $1 (Virtual) Computer</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/OneDollarComputer.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/OneDollarComputer.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
How cheap can a computer be, using current technology? If we accept that the
most important thing about <i>your</i> computer that makes it "yours" is the
bits written onto the hard disk, then using <b>LiveCD</b> technology, you can
own a <b>"virtual computer"</b> for just <b>US$1</b>. The only additional
cost is that of hiring a real computer to host your virtual computer while
you are using it &ndash; and this should be no more and no less than the cost
of hiring a computer in an Internet caf&eacute;. ]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 06 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>What is an Algorithm?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhatIsAnAlgorithm.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhatIsAnAlgorithm.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
The difficulty of formally defining a particular <b>algorithm</b> is related
to the problem of achieving <b>re-use</b>, because if we could write an
algorithm down in a definitive form, then software developers would never
have to rewrite that algorithm ever again.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>When is a Simulation the Same as the Thing being Simulated?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhenIsASimulation.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhenIsASimulation.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Part of John Searle's <b>Chinese Room Argument</b> is that a
<b>simulation</b> of something is different from the thing itself. But is
this always true? Can a simulation of an object from category <b>X</b> itself
be an object from category <b>X</b>? In particular, can a simulation via
computer software of an object from category <b>X</b> itself be an object
from category <b>X</b>? The surprising answer is, yes, it can be, <i>if</i>
category <b>X</b> is a category of <b>information processing system</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Does Your Text-To-Speech System Sound Like a Zombie?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/ZombieSpeech.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/ZombieSpeech.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
According to my <b>super-stimulus theory</b> of music, music perception is
actually the perception of an aspect of speech, and this aspect provides
information about the <b>consciousness</b> of the speaker. It follows that if
you are creating a <b>text-to-speech</b> system, which does not take account
of my theory, then your system will probably talk like a <b>zombie</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Is Music a Drug?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/IsMusicADrug.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/IsMusicADrug.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
<b>Music</b> acts on our emotions and feelings. <b>Drugs</b> act on our
emotions and feelings. We generally recognise that the feelings created by
drugs are not "real". Does the same apply to music? Is music a drug?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Irrelevance of Absolute Pitch to Music Science</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AbsolutePitch.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AbsolutePitch.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
The phenomenon of <b>absolute pitch</b> may not be completely irrelevant to
the scientific study of music, but it is much less relevant than some people
think it is.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 09 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How Does a Neuron Know What To Do?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowDoesANeuronKnowWhatToDo.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowDoesANeuronKnowWhatToDo.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
The <b>"meaning"</b> of a <b>neuron</b> is not something that is precisely
pre-determined, and it can easily change over time. Which makes it difficult
to describe exactly what the <b>"job"</b> of a neuron is. But we can apply an
<b>economic analogy</b> to define the individual neuron as an
<b>"entrepeneur"</b>, tasked with producing the most valuable possible
outputs from the available inputs.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Bootstrapping the Mind</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/BootstrappingTheMind.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/BootstrappingTheMind.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
How do you load programs into a computer? You use a program-loading program.
But how do you load that program? That's the <b>bootstrap</b> problem. It's a
problem for those designing computers, and, when you think about it, it's
also a problem for the "design" of the human brain/mind.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>There is (Almost) No Such Thing as the "Common Good"</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/CommonGood.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/CommonGood.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
The notion of <b>"The Common Good"</b> implies that humanity has common
goals. But a bit of biology tells us that there are (almost) no common goals
of humanity. The only possible common goals are <b>survival of the human
race</b> and <b>expansion into space</b>. All other goals relate to
<b>relative success</b>, and it is logically impossible for everyone to be
relatively successful.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Biology of Morality</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/BiologyOfMorality.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/BiologyOfMorality.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Can we scientifically explain <b>morality</b>? What is the <b>purpose</b> of
morality? What is the difference between <b>"moral truth"</b> and
<b>"scientific truth"</b>? Does this difference mean that science has no
right to make claims about the nature of morality? Is morality
<b>absolute</b> or is it <b>relative</b>?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How to Double Your Vote in New Zealand's Elections</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/DoubleYourVote.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/DoubleYourVote.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Do <b>New Zealanders</b> really understand their own electoral system? If
they do, why aren't they all doubling their effective party votes by voting
for <b>overhang candidates</b>?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Absolute DRM Corrupts Absolutely</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AbsoluteDRMCorrupts.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AbsoluteDRMCorrupts.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
<b>DRM</b> requires someone else to have <b>power</b> over your computer.
<b>Absolute DRM</b> means <b>absolute power</b>, and as <b>Lord Acton</b>
famously said, absolute power is not a good thing.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Can Amateur Scientists Do Theoretical Science?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AmateurTheoreticalScience.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AmateurTheoreticalScience.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
It's hard enough for <b>amateur scientists</b> to do any kind of science, and
be taken seriously. But <b>theoretical science</b> appears to be 100% the
domain of professionals. Is there any way that amateur scientists can make a
useful contribution to the development of scientific theories? Can we invent
new Internet/Web technology to solve this problem?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Principles of Mind Energy</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/PrinciplesOfMindEnergy.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/PrinciplesOfMindEnergy.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
<b>Mind Energy</b> is a useful concept that helps to explain the interaction
between <b>volition</b> (or "willpower") and <b>feelings</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Disorganized Incremental Software Development</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/DisorganizedIncrementalSoftwareDevelopment.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/DisorganizedIncrementalSoftwareDevelopment.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Is there a way to <b>develop and distribute software</b> such that any
contribution from anyone can be added to a software project without any
explicit co-ordination between any of the parties involved? What if there was
only <i>one</i> way to write any software component? You could give everyone
<b>"commit"</b> rights. You wouldn't even need <b>version control</b>!]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Open Source Singularity</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/OpenSourceSingularity.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/OpenSourceSingularity.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
The <b>Technological Singularity</b> is a predicted future event in human
history caused by the ever-increasing ability of new technology to speed up
the rate at which new technology is developed. There is one type of
technology that has an enormous potential for self-hosted speedup in the very
short term: <b>open source software</b> on the Internet.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 18 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How to Do Cube Roots of 9 Digit Numbers in Your Head</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/CubeRoots.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/CubeRoots.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Yes, with a bit of practice, you too can calculate the cube root of a 9 digit
number, <i>in your head</i>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Proof of Unique Factorisation by Primes Theorem</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/UniqueFactorisation.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/UniqueFactorisation.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
An explanation of the <b>Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic</b>, which states
that every natural number has a <i>unique</i> factorisation into prime
numbers.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The "Purpose of Life"</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/PurposeOfLife.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/PurposeOfLife.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
How scientifically can we answer questions about the <b>purpose of life</b>?
Is it even scientifically meaningful to talk about "purpose"?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Please Help Me Find the Musicality Brain Cells</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicalityBrainCells.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicalityBrainCells.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
The <b>super-stimulus</b> theory of music predicts the existence of a
specific type of brain cell whose sole purpose is to detect musicality. It
should be possible to detect these cells anatomically, and maybe someone
already has. Can you help me to find them?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>A New Name for Identity Theft: "Negligent Identification"</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/IdentityTheft.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/IdentityTheft.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
We've all been conned. The term <b>"identify theft"</b> describes an
interaction between the fraudster and the victim, but it fails to accuse the
intermediary in the transaction of any wrong-doing. A better term would be
<b>"negligent identification"</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How to Secure a Website Against Weak User Passwords</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WeakUserPasswords.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WeakUserPasswords.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
In an ideal world, website passwords with a "guess factor" of, for instance,
10000, would provide sufficient security for most users, and so-called
"strong" passwords would be less necessary. But you, as website developer,
have to make some effort to provide this level of security to your
users.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How I Invented Social Bookmarking</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowIInventedSocialBookmarking.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowIInventedSocialBookmarking.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
I never implemented my invention, and I never patented it. All that is left
now is a copy of a web page on <a
href="http://www.archive.org">Wayback</a>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Limitations of Statistical Methods for Analysing Music</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/LimitationsOfStatisticalAnalysisOfMusic.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/LimitationsOfStatisticalAnalysisOfMusic.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
<b>Statistical analysis</b> of <b>music</b> promises to deliver
<b>algorithms</b> that can distinguish "good" music from "bad" music. But
analyses disconnected from <b>biology</b> are unlikely to lead to any major
improvement in our understanding of what music <i>is</i>, even if they result
in the discovery of significant correlations between observed characteristics
of music and its popularity.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The "Name of a Name" Pattern</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/NameOfANamePattern.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/NameOfANamePattern.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
It's important to insulate your code from changes to external identifiers
used to communicate with external systems.<br>
Or is it?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Can the Internet Think?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/CanTheInternetThink.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/CanTheInternetThink.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Can the Internet think? Is it a <b>consciou</b>s entity? I suggest that
<b>attention</b>, <b>belief</b> and <b>knowledge</b> are relevant attributes
that the Internet needs to develop before it can become conscious. Various
collaborative and voting-based social websites appear to be the start of a
process which will unify these attributes across all or most of the Internet,
turning it into a recognisable thinking "being".]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>A New Form of Advertising: Transparent Paid Reviews</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/NewFormOfAdvertisingTransparentPaidReviews.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/NewFormOfAdvertisingTransparentPaidReviews.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
An alternative to <b>advertising</b> is <b>paid reviews</b>. But if the
reviews are to be credible, the process by which they are paid for must be
totally transparent, and the reviewer must be prepared to put their own
reputation on the line.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Consciousness is a Centre of Accountability</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/ConsciousnessIsACentreOfAccountability.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/ConsciousnessIsACentreOfAccountability.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
The defining aspect of <b>consciousness</b> is that it is a centre of
<b>responsility</b> and <b>accountability</b> in the brain.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Brain &#8211; An Orchestra With A Conductor</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/TheBrainAnOrchestraWithAConductor.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/TheBrainAnOrchestraWithAConductor.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
In <a
href="http://www.mpg.de/english/illustrationsDocumentation/multimedia/mpResearch/2005/heft03/3_05MPR_14_18_pdf.pdf">"The
Brain &ndash; An Orchestra Without A Conductor"</a>, Wolf Singer argues that
the brain lacks any coordinating supervisor, despite our strong intuition
that our mind does have some central point of control. The only thing is,
orchestras <i>do</i> have conductors, and there are good reasons why they
have conductors. And these reasons apply equally to the human brain.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>An Internet-Based Examination System</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/InternetBasedExamSystem.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/InternetBasedExamSystem.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
The Internet is great for those who wish to educate themselves informally and
cheaply. But what if you want to achieve a formal qualification? This article
describes an architecture for an Internet-based computerised examination
system.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>A Proposal for Multi-Level Mixed Hottish/Newish Pages on Reddit</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HottishNewishProposal.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HottishNewishProposal.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
<a href="http://reddit.com/">Reddit</a> has a <a
href="http://reddit.com/hot">Hot</a> page and a <a
href="http://reddit.com/new">New</a> page. Each of these has its advantages
and disadvantages, and there is a case for allowing users to select pages
with in-between characteristics.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How (Not) to Create and Promote Your Non-Mainstream Theoretical Science Website</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/NonMainstreamTheoreticalScience.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/NonMainstreamTheoreticalScience.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Advice on how to create and promote your <b>non-mainstream theoretical
science website</b>, based on my own personal experience. Since I haven't
been very successful in getting anyone anywhere to take any notice of my
ideas on a wide range of subjects, which include <a
href="http://www.1729.com/evolution/2ndlaw.html">thermodynamics and evolution</a>, <a
href="http://www.1729.com/consciousness/index.html">consciousness</a>,
<a href="http://www.1729.com/dreams/index.html">dreams</a>, <a
href="http://www.1729.com/blog/HowDoesANeuronKnowWhatToDo.html">neuroscience</a>
and (most recently) <a href="http://whatismusic.info/">music</a>, it
could also be read as advice on how <i>not</i> to create and promote your
non-mainstream theoretical science website.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>A Web 2.0 Peer-Reviewed Science Journal</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/Web2.0ScienceJournal.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/Web2.0ScienceJournal.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
In Web 1.0, some scientific journals put their content on the web. And now
there are pre-print archives, PLOS and open peer-review. But a fully Web 2.0
peer-reviewed journal goes further than this: the journal cedes control and
responsibility to authors and reviewers, and if there is any journal at all,
it takes the form of a post-publication aggregation of the output of selected
authors and reviewers. Web 2.0 peer review promises to achieve something that
Web 1.0 peer review can't: the revival of amateur science as a contributor to
mainstream science.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How I Invented a Decentralised Scaleable Push-Based Micronews System in 2000</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowIInventedAMicronewsSystem.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowIInventedAMicronewsSystem.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
<a href="http://feedtree.net/">FeedTree</a> is the latest entrant into
the "micronews" business, with a proposed solution to the <b>RSS
Bandwidth</b> problem. But I invented a system with very similar properties
in <b>2000</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How the Tech Industry Could Fund Free Content</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowToFundFreeContent.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowToFundFreeContent.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Combine my <a href="http://www.1729.com/ip/PublicGood.html">Voted
Compensation</a> system with a suggestion from <b>Hannibal</b> at <a
href="http://arstechnica.com/">ArsTechnica</a>, and you end up with a
practical scheme for worldwide funding of free entertainment content, where
consumers pick the winners <i>after</i> they are produced, and not
before.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Could There Exist a Very Large Natural Number Physically Equal to Zero?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/LargeNaturalNumberPhysicallyEqualToZero.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/LargeNaturalNumberPhysicallyEqualToZero.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Whether or not <b>Euclidean geometry</b> is true started out as a
mathematical question, but it eventually evolved into a physical question,
i.e. <b>is Euclidean geometry the geometry of the universe</b>? Nowadays we
believe in both Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries, because they can both
be defined numerically. But we can ask the same kind of question about number
systems. For example, <b>is natural number arithmetic the arithmetic of the
universe?</b> If it isn't, one plausible alternative is <b>arithmetic modulo
N</b>, where <b>N</b> is some very large number. If arithmetic modulo
<b>N</b> is the arithmetic of the universe, it follows that the number
<b>N</b> is <b>physically equal to zero</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Cat is Not in a Mixed State because the Box Leaks Information (Very, Very Quickly)</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/SchroedingersCat.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/SchroedingersCat.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
<b>Schroedinger's Cat</b> does not remain in a <b>mixed state</b> (relative
to macroscopic observers outside of the box) for any measurable length of
time, because even the tiniest bit of information about the cat's state
<b>leaking out of the box</b> is enough to correlate the wave functions of
the cat and any external observer.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Singularity: Purpose and Transition</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/SingularityPurposeTransition.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/SingularityPurposeTransition.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
The <b>technological singularity</b> can only <b>transition</b> to pure
machine intelligence if it can find a way to maintain <b>purpose</b>. But
purpose depends on <b>reproduction</b> and <b>natural selection</b>, which
may not apply to a machine-based super-intelligence.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>WAP and the Multiverse: A Scientific Theory of Miracles</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WAPAndTheMultiverseAScientificTheoryOfMiracles.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WAPAndTheMultiverseAScientificTheoryOfMiracles.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Traditional science excludes <b>miracles</b> altogether. But <b>quantum
mechanics</b> and <b>thermodynamics</b> make miracles <b>possible</b>, the
<b>Multiverse</b> makes them <b>likely</b>, and the <b>Weak Anthropic
Principle</b> makes it possible for us to actually observe them.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Bird-Spotting Tetris Effect</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/BirdSpottingTetrisEffect.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/BirdSpottingTetrisEffect.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
<a
href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0001F172-55DA-1C75-9B81809EC588EF21">Tetris
Dreams</a> are dreams you have when you have been playing Tetris too
much. Something similar happens to me when <b>I spot unfamiliar bird
species</b> in my dreams.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Lightly Host-Reviewed Advertising</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/LightlyReviewedAdvertising.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/LightlyReviewedAdvertising.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
I present another attempt to find a way in which <b>website hosts</b> can
make some effort to increase the <b>credibility of advertising</b> that they
host on their website, thus <b>increasing the value of the advertising
space</b> that they sell, without staking <i>too</i> much of their own
reputation on the results.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Why Bird Songs Sound Musical To Us</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhyBirdSongsSoundMusicalToUs.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhyBirdSongsSoundMusicalToUs.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
If bird "songs" are not <b>bird music</b>, then why do they <b>sound
musical</b> to us?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Second Law of Thermodynamics Does Not Prohibit a Decrease of Entropy in a Closed System</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/SecondLawDoesntProhibitEntropyDecrease.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/SecondLawDoesntProhibitEntropyDecrease.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[A <b>common mistake</b>, sometimes made even by <b>mathematics professors</b> in the 
appendices of their textbooks, is to assume that the <b>Second Law</b> prohibits <i>any</i> decrease
in the entropy of a closed system. <b>But it doesn't.</b> It only prohibits "macroscopic" decreases in entropy.
Which is a good thing, because <b>evolution by natural selection</b> <i>requires</i> the occurrence of
small entropy decreases in closed systems.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Some Questions that the Music Mathematicians Forgot to Ask</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicMathematicians.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicMathematicians.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[There are some people out there investigating the <b>mathematics</b> of <b>music</b>
using quite sophisticated concepts from <b>group theory</b> and <b>category theory</b>. But is this mathematics
really telling us anything interesting about what music <i>is</i>?
I highlight some <b>questions</b> that the <b>music mathematicians forgot to ask</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Dina Paucar: Peruvian Huayno Singer With An Unusual Singing Style</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/DinaPaucar.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/DinaPaucar.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[The Peruvian singer <b>Dina Paucar</b> sings <b>Huayno</b>
in a very distinctive style which achieves a strong emotional effect.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>AganeAndAgane &#8211; Supporting Repetitionism in the Enterprise</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AganeAndAgane.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AganeAndAgane.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[The traditional philosophy  of <b>"DRY"</b> (<b>D</b>on't <b>R</b>epeat <b>Y</b>ourself) 
considers all <b>repetition</b> in the <b>source code</b> to be <b>"harmful"</b>. But the 
<b>AganeAndAgane</b> programming language is based on a newer philosophy of <b>"DRYDBERIOK"</b>.
]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Notes on Writing a 2-D Video Game in Javascript</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/NotesOnWriting2DJavascriptVideoGame.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/NotesOnWriting2DJavascriptVideoGame.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Some handy tips on writing an <b>animated 2-D video game</b>
in <b>Javascript</b> which can run directly in the web browser, based on my experience
writing the game <b>PrimeShooter<sup><small>TM</small></sup></b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Puzzle-Oriented Versus Meaning-Oriented Programming</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/PuzzleOrientedVersusMeaningOrientedProgramming.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/PuzzleOrientedVersusMeaningOrientedProgramming.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Most real-world programming is like <b>solving a puzzle</b>. But some programmers
see writing programs as a way of <b>expressing meaning</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How to Create a Pro-Am Music Science Community in Four Easy Steps</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/ProAmMusicScienceCommunity.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/ProAmMusicScienceCommunity.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<b>Four steps</b> towards creating an <b>online music science community</b>
that attracts attention and contributions from both <b>professionals</b> and <b>amateurs</b>. These
techniques may also be of interest to anyone else trying to create an online community
on a specialist topic.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>DSL Metaprogramming: Five Kinds of Source Code</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MetaprogrammingFiveKindsOfSourceCode.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MetaprogrammingFiveKindsOfSourceCode.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<b>Traditional programming</b> requires the programmer to deal with
<b>one</b> kind of source code written in <b>one</b> programming language.
<b>DSL-based metaprogramming</b> requires the programmer to handle <b>five</b> different kinds
of source code (written in at least <b>three</b> different languages).]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Music Perception: What Is It That We Perceive When We Perceive Music?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicPerception.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicPerception.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[One of the things that <b>music scientists</b> study about <b>music</b> is <b>music perception</b>.
But <b>"music perception"</b> is the <b>perception</b> of <b>music</b>, and <b>music</b> is something that we <b>don't know what it is</b>.
In fact, music appears to be something created entirely so that <b><i>we can perceive it</i></b>. Which is
all <b>very circular</b>.
]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Three Questions That Music Scientists Need To Ask</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/ThreeQuestionsThatMusicScientistsNeedToAsk.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/ThreeQuestionsThatMusicScientistsNeedToAsk.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
Which is the <b>biological adaptation</b>: <b>making music</b> or <b>listening to music</b> (or both)?
What makes some music <b>better</b> than other music?
Would what I am saying about music make sense if I said the same thing about
<b>something else</b>?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How to Get Your Article Onto The Digg Front Page, Twice</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowToGetYourArticleOntoTheDiggFrontPageTwice.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowToGetYourArticleOntoTheDiggFrontPageTwice.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[It's good if you can get a <b>lot of traffic to your website</b> because 
one of your articles appears on the <b>front page of <a href="http://digg.com/">Digg</a></b>. 
It can be even better when an article <b>makes it to the front page <i>twice</i></b>.
Read this article to find out the four steps to follow if you want <i>your</i> article to appear on
the front page of Digg twice.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Musical Genomics and the Musical Astrocyte Theory</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicalGenomics.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicalGenomics.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Combining recent advances in identifying <b>human accelerated regions</b>
in the <b>human genome</b> with the possibility that music perception involves
<b>non-neuronal circuitry</b> (i.e. <b>glial cells</b> such as <b>astrocytes</b>), it may be
sooner rather than later that a strong candidate for a <b>musical gene</b> can be identified.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Is There Musical Syntax Like Language Syntax?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/IsThereMusicalSyntaxLikeLanguageSyntax.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/IsThereMusicalSyntaxLikeLanguageSyntax.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Is there a <b>syntax</b> of <b>music</b> which is analogous
to the <b>syntax</b> of <b>language</b>? Some recently published scientific studies
explore this analogy, and identify the <b>"rules"</b>, <b>"principles"</b> and <b>"regularities"</b> of 
music with <b>"syntax"</b>. However, musical items
may be <b>constrained by certain rules</b> because they are <b>local solutions</b> to an <b>optimisation problem</b>.
I suggest an <b>experimental protocol</b> which tests this hypothesis by looking for <b>dissociation</b>
between <b>musical expectation</b> and <b>musical pleasure</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Music is Things that Happen and Things that Don't Happen</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicIsThingsThatHappenAndThingsThatDontHappen.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicIsThingsThatHappenAndThingsThatDontHappen.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<b>Music</b> is defined by <b>what happens within it</b> and <b>what 
<i>doesn't</i> happen within it</b>, and by the <b>contrast</b> between the things that happen
and the things that don't happen. This "things that happen"/"things that don't happen" contrast
is the <b>musical universal</b>, which accounts for both <b>pitch-related aspects</b> and <b>rhythm-related
aspects</b> of music.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Are Musical Items Intrinsically Musical?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/IsMusicalityIntrinsic.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/IsMusicalityIntrinsic.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[If <b>musical taste</b> is <b>subjective</b>, then perhaps music is not
<i>intrinsically</i> musical. But we often talk about our subjective judgements
as if they were <b>objective</b>, or at least <b>independent
of the beholder</b>. If <b>musicality</b> as a property of musical items
is intrinsic in the sense of being <b>consistently inter-subjective</b>, 
this has important consequences for <b>music science</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 18 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Definition of "Automobile" (by a Music Theorist)</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/DefinitionOfAutomobileByAMusicTheorist.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/DefinitionOfAutomobileByAMusicTheorist.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Every introduction to the study of <b>automobiles</b> must
start with the question of <b>definition</b>. Using techniques of discourse and 
analysis borrowed from the
academic study of <b>music theory</b> and <b>music philosophy</b>, a complete
and satisfying definition of the word <b>"automobile"</b> is derived in three steps. A special challenge to the
student's thinking about automobiles is included at the end of the article.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Adding Comments to My Blog</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AddingCommentsToMyBlog.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AddingCommentsToMyBlog.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[I am adding comments to my blog. This blog entry is a 
sandbox-style entry for trying it out.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Zero Divided By Zero: Application to Spherical Coordinates</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/ZeroDividedByZero.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/ZeroDividedByZero.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[
<b>Zero</b> divided by <b>zero</b> is a value which according to mathematical
tradition does not make
any sense. Not only is it <b>undefined</b>, it is also <b>indeterminate</b>.
Can one invent a useful "algebra" that includes such a value?
]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Were the Neanderthals Ugly?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WereTheNeanderthalsUgly.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WereTheNeanderthalsUgly.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[If, as the genetic evidence suggests, 
the <b>Neanderthals</b> were a <b>separate species</b>, then they must have
been <b>ugly</b>, and they would have looked even uglier to our modern human ancestors than
they would look to us if we saw them now. (Of course our ancestors looked ugly to them too.)
Despite this <b>mutual repulsion</b>, the genetic evidence suggests that occasional <b>inter-species 
mating</b> did occur, although such encounters <b>may not necessarily have been consensual</b> for both parties.
]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Web 2.0? We Haven't Finished Decentralising Yet.</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WeHaventFinishedDecentralisingYet.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WeHaventFinishedDecentralisingYet.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Two central themes in "Web 2.0" are <b>decentralisation</b> and
<b>ownership</b>. Voting sites like <b>Digg</b> and <b>Reddit</b> are considered to be
"Web 2.0". But they aren't fully decentralised. <b>True decentralisation</b> would mean
ownership of <b>content</b> by the <b>content producer</b>, ownership of <b>voting identity and votes</b> by the
voter, and separate ownership of the <b>aggregation process</b> by the <b>aggregator</b>. In each case
"ownership" would be by means of association with the owner's <b>domain name</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Looking for a Win/Win Solution to the War Between "Premium Content" and Digital Freedom</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/LookingForAWinWin.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/LookingForAWinWin.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<b>Copyrights</b> and <b>patents</b> link payment for the creation of ideas and content
to the ability to <b>control</b> the use of ideas and content. This causes a direct <b>conflict</b> between
<b>intellectual property</b> and <b>digital freedoms</b>. The conflict is most intense for high-budget content
sold to a mass-market &ndash; so called <b>"premium content" </b>&ndash; where big money is involved. 
The conflict could become a war to the death, and I think we will all be 
better off if we can find an alternative: a way to pay for 
premium content <i>without</i> sacrificing our digital freedoms.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Is Music a "Puzzle" or a "Mystery"?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/IsMusicAPuzzleOrAMystery.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/IsMusicAPuzzleOrAMystery.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Is <b>music</b> a <b>puzzle</b>, which requires access to 
special <b>inside information</b> to be solved, or is it a <b>mystery</b>,
where we already have enough information, and we just need to work out how
to use that information?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>God's Perfect Exception</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/GodsPerfectException.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/GodsPerfectException.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[On the first day, <b>God</b> created the <b>perfect exception</b> ...]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Why do Song Lyrics Sound Significant and Profound When We Hear Them in Songs?</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhyDoSongLyricsSoundSignificantAndProfound.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhyDoSongLyricsSoundSignificantAndProfound.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<b>Song lyrics</b> seem more <b>significant</b> and <b>profound</b> than they really are.
Is this an <b>accidental side-effect</b>, or is it due to the operation of
an <b>adaptive brain system</b> whose very <b>purpose</b> is to <b>estimate the signficance
and profundity</b> of what is being said?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>A Survey of HTML Annotation Methods</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HtmlAnnotations.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HtmlAnnotations.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[I try out nine different methods for <b>annotating</b> <b>HTML</b> elements, 
judging each method according to five criteria: <b>proximity</b>, <b>non-kludginess</b>, 
<b>syntactic correctness</b>, <b>reliability</b> and <b>absence of side-effects</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>A Contribution to the "What is Music?" Project</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhatIsMusicProject.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhatIsMusicProject.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[I recently wrote an article 
<a href="http://myformicatable.blogspot.com/2007/03/super-stimulus-theory-article-by-philip.html">What is Music?</a> 
explaining my <a href="http://whatismusic.info">super-stimulus theory of music</a>,
which <a href="http://myformicatable.blogspot.com">Jack Hunter</a> kindly posted as part of his
<a href="http://myformicatable.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-is-music-project-and-other-tales.html">What is Music Project</a>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Advice on Making Experimental Music, based on the Super-Stimulus Theory</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AdviceOnMakingExperimentalMusic.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AdviceOnMakingExperimentalMusic.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[A scientific <b>theory</b> should be able to inform the
<b>experimental</b> scientist. Here I show how the <b>super-stimulus theory</b> of music
can suggest better approaches to <b>musical experimentation</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 25 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>What If Anyone Could ...</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhatIfAnyoneCould.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/WhatIfAnyoneCould.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[There are things that <b>only a select few can do</b>. And there are things
that <b>almost <i>anyone</i> can do</b>. But as time passes, and technology develops (and
develops at an accelerating rate), some things move from the "select few can do it" to the 
"anyone can do it" category.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 19 May 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Commentary on "The Distance Geometry of Music"</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/CommentaryOnTheDistanceGeometryOfMusic.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/CommentaryOnTheDistanceGeometryOfMusic.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[A commentary on the paper
<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.4085">The Distance Geometry of Music</a>
in relation to the <b>super-stimulus theory of music</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The (Hypothetical) Wifi Tablet that is Better Than a Book</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HypotheticalWifiTabletThatIsBetterThanABook.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HypotheticalWifiTabletThatIsBetterThanABook.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Why haven't <b>computers</b> yet replaced <b>books</b> and <b>magazines</b>? Although books
have <b>various advantages</b> over all existing <b>"e-books"</b> and other computerised reading devices,
I think there is <b>only one advantage that really matters</b>, and what's more, I think that we
<i>already</i> have the <b>technology</b> available to <b>eliminate that advantage</b> &ndash; someone just
needs to <b>put all the right pieces together</b> in the right way.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Ten Ways to Make Internet Banking Safer</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/TenWaysToMakeInternetBankingSafer.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/TenWaysToMakeInternetBankingSafer.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Advice addressed to <b>banking customers</b>, <b>banks</b>, <b>ISP's</b>,
<b>developers of operating systems</b> and <b>hardware manufacturers</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Are you an Application Security Tester? (Questionnaire)</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AreYouAnApplicationSecurityTesterQuestionnaire.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/AreYouAnApplicationSecurityTesterQuestionnaire.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[If you are an <b>application security tester</b>,
you should be able to answer <b>yes</b> to all <b>three</b> of these <b>questions</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Secret Hidden Process of Worldview Construction</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/TheSecretHiddenProcessOfWorldviewConstruction.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/TheSecretHiddenProcessOfWorldviewConstruction.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<b>Uncritical listening</b> may play a significant role
in <b>worldview construction</b>, simply because there is no other means
of acquiring information as efficiently.
But, because it is (obviously) vulnerable to manipulation, it must occur
in a <b>secret</b> manner which is kept <b>hidden</b> from both the
<b>speaker</b> and the <b>listener</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Music: A Drug, Which Used To Be Stronger Than It Is Now</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicADrugWhichUsedToBeStronger.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicADrugWhichUsedToBeStronger.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[If <b>music</b> is like a <b>drug</b>, then why haven't we 
<b>evolved resistance</b> to it? Or have we indeed already evolved resistance?
In which case, the emotional and pleasurable effect of 
music may have been much stronger in the past than it is now.
]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Musicality and Behavioural Modernity</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicalityAndBehaviouralModernity.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicalityAndBehaviouralModernity.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[The development of the human ability to perceive <b>musicality</b>
may have triggered one of the most important events in <b>human evolution</b>:
the appearance of <b>modern behaviour</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Ten Ways LiveCD Security Could Fail</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/TenWaysLiveCDSecurityCouldFail.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/TenWaysLiveCDSecurityCouldFail.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[The most secure way I know to do <b>Internet banking</b> is
to do it on a PC booted from a <b>LiveCD</b>. However no system is perfect, so
here I consider <b>ten ways</b> that LiveCD security could <b>fail</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Musical Immunity and Auditory Super-Cheesecake</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicalImmunityAndAuditorySuperCheesecake.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicalImmunityAndAuditorySuperCheesecake.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[If <b>music</b> is like a <b>mental virus</b>,
then the brain's response to it is analogous to how the <b>immune
system</b> responds to germs. Another useful metaphor is
Steven Pinker's <b>"auditory cheesecake"</b>, but if music is
a very powerful <b>super-stimulus</b>, then a better phrase might
be <b>"auditory super-cheesecake"</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Evolutionary Implications of Amusia</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/EvolutionaryImplicationsOfAmusia.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/EvolutionaryImplicationsOfAmusia.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Both <b>adaptive</b> and <b>non-adaptive</b> <b>theories</b>
of <b>music</b> have to deal with the problem of <b>amusia</b>.
For <b>adaptive theories</b>, amusia is a <b>deficit</b> in the <b>creation</b>
and <b>appreciation</b> of music itself, and the problem is to explain how music
helps long-term reproduction.
In the case of <b>non-adaptive theories</b>, there has to be some <i>other</i>
<b>cognitive deficit</b> associated with amusia, i.e. other than the
inability to create and appreciate music.
]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Music: The Hidden Sense and the Three Ways of Knowing</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicTheHiddenSenseAndTheThreeWaysOfKnowing.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicTheHiddenSenseAndTheThreeWaysOfKnowing.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<b>Music perception</b> reveals to us an otherwise <b>hidden sense</b>. 
The <b>three ways of knowing</b> are <b>genetic</b>, <b>experiential learning</b>
and <b>cultural learning</b>. Cultural learning can be <b>verified</b> or <b>unverified</b>.
<b>"Musicality" perception</b> is a hidden sense that
increases the reliability of <b>unverified cultural learning</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>"Music Theory" is not the Same Thing as a Theory of Music</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicTheoryIsNotTheSameThingAsATheoryOfMusic.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/MusicTheoryIsNotTheSameThingAsATheoryOfMusic.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<b>Music theory</b> is <b>theory</b> in the sense that it is distinct from
musical <b>practice</b>, but it is not theory in the sense of being a <b>scientific theory</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How to Create an Audio CD Using Sox and InfraRecorder</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowToCreateAnAudioCdUsingSoxAndInfraRecorder.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/HowToCreateAnAudioCdUsingSoxAndInfraRecorder.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[How to <b>create an audio CD</b> using the open-source
applications <b>SoX</b> and <b>InfraRecorder</b>.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Synaptic Downscaling and the Dream-Maker</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/SynapticDownscalingAndTheDreamMaker.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/SynapticDownscalingAndTheDreamMaker.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[Can the <b>Dream-Maker</b> theory of dreams be reconciled with 
the theory of <b>synaptic downscaling</b> proposed by <b>Giulio Tononi</b>
and <b>Chiara Cirelli</b>?]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>The Really Basic Business WebSite</title>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/TheReallyBasicBusinessWebSite.html]]></link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.1729.com/blog/TheReallyBasicBusinessWebSite.html]]></guid>
  <description><![CDATA[The <b>really basic business web-site</b> is a web-site
owned by you and controlled by you.
It provides the basic facts about your business, and, it can be found when
someone searches on Google for the name of your business.]]></description>
  <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +1200]]></pubDate>
</item>

  </channel>
</rss>
